Global Notes #25

Socialist Segolene Royal and conservative Nicolas Sarkozy go head-to-head in French electionsby Jerry Harris, SolidarityEconomy.net . Income up for Venezuelan poor A marketing research group, Datos, reports that the real income of the poorest Venezuelans, 58 percent of the country, have risen 130 percent under President Hugo Chavez. Although inflation is running at 19.3 percent that is lower than the 52 percent average in the early 1990s before Chavez took office. . What they say Neoliberal economist Adam Posen recently attacked Germany’s Mittelstand economic sector. These are the middle and small size business’ that employ 70 percent of the German people. Writing for the Peterson Institute for International Economics, Posen says, “Most people say they’re wonderful; I say they’re evil. The argument I make is you have small and medium-size companies that don’t achieve economies of scale, are very loyal to locality, have entrenched incumbent management and work in collusion with local politicians and banks. They’re not accountable to shareholders because they’re not publicly listed, they’re closed to consolidation and they like to stay open whether or not business makes sense.” Sounds like everything most people want, locally responsible business’ working with local officials unaffected by the short-term profit driven stock market and concentrating on long-term value and employment – just what low-roaders like Posen hate. . Workers of Europe unite? More corporations in Europe are listing as an European Company (SE) rather than with a specific national identity. This allows them to operate in all 27 EU member countries as one legal entity. Recently some big German companies, Allianz and Man have gone SE with the giant Chemical company BASF to follow. One of the motivations is to weaken the position of German unions on corporate boards, where in accordance with co-determination laws, workers are given half the seats on supervisory boards. German unions now must share those seats with workers from other countries, for example in Allianz, with French and British union representatives. A rather strange state of affairs when corporations promote international worker solidarity and the local union finds it a problem. The SE status is a growing aspect of globalization. Paul Achleitner of Allianz says, “A totally German-dominated board dealing with global issues makes no sense. If you have an international business, why should there be a monopoly for German employees to be represented on the supervisory board?” . French political/economic divide France is in the middle of a hot presidential election with candidates on both the left and right promising to protect French jobs and industry. But while the body politic is talking protectionism, French transnationals are moving out and abroad. The air and defense corporation EADS and Alcatel-Lucent have laid-off thousands of workers in restructuring schemes and French business’ continue to acquire abroad. The most recent moves are PPR’s bid for Germany’s Puma, Unibail wanting to acquire the Dutch Rodamco and Suez going after Barcelona’s water utility. As Paul Betts comments in the Financial Times, “It seems French politicians have become largely irrelevant for France’s big companies. This is hardly surprising, given that the vast majority of profits and revenues – and indeed in many cases even employees—are outside France. The conclusion is obvious. Business has gone global while French politics remains firmly entrenched at home.” Betts’ observations hold true for most countries in the world today. The working/middle class has come to see globalization as a threat putting pressure on political parties across the globe to protect jobs and living standards. Not worried about such things, transnational capitalist continue to build the economic foundations of globalization.

email2friend

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://www.solidarityeconomy.net/2007/04/23/global-notes-25/trackback/

One Response to “Global Notes #25”

  1. [...] Most people did not respond. I have no idea what they were thinking, when they read my response. My guess is that they chalked it up to me being some nut job red, who refuses to see the light of reality. Or it went to their spam folder, either way the responses I received were few.Who are these gringos that are sending these emails out? I thought they were like me. They are from the U.S. or Canada living in a Latin American country considering taking on the title of expatriate, but never committing to it fully. I assumed people who chose this path were people who understand that Latin Americans want change. If people hadn’t noticed, history has not been kind to the people of Latin America. I started to ask around about why people were so pleased with the outcome of the constitutional referendum in Venezuela. The answers came in.People began quoting wild statistics and facts about what Chavez wanted for Venezuela. These ranged from: he wanted to be a monarch; he wanted completely dismantle private industry; the state wanted to own the children; etc. Really? If this is true than I have been completely wrong. A monarch? This guy must be crazy. Then I thought about it and asked, “Wait, why hadn’t I read any of this?” I tend to read a lot, and I swear I had not run across anything like this before, so I decided to dig in.Let’s look at the notion of the state wanting to own the children statement. A very good friend of mine brings this point up a lot. She knows a woman who lived in Venezuela, has a Venezuelan husband, and now works in one of the richest and most elite private schools in the country of Ecuador. Her yarns of the new Venezuela are nothing short of a World War II Nazi thriller. She claims the Venezuelan state will take ownership of your child at the age of 14. The entire country is going to hell, and is far worse than it used to be.My friend will concede that this point of view may be skewed, but she will not drop this “the state will own your children” bit. I decided to do a little bit of research, because this had to be coming from somewhere. I cannot fathom why the state would want your kids. I have found nothing close to what she has told me. I was discussing the lack of evidence with a second friend, who said “No Josh, it is true that they want to control the children. They do not want infants to leave Venezuela.”Ok, now I am confused. Like a bad game of telephone, I have no idea what the story actually is. Which is it? Is it both? Had I been completely and utterly duped by the Hugo Chavez and the call for a new Latin America? I decided to go back to the internet and keep researching. Once again I found nothing. What was going on here? Why are two people who I consider smart, trustworthy folks telling me stories that I cannot confirm with any sort of evidence? Nor, for that matter, can they?(If anyone has a website, article, book, video, anything on these matters PLEASE send it to me. I can take Spanish or English material.)The only thing I can remotely find that comes near to this is a want by the Venezuelan government to have some national curriculum standards. And well, call me a commie, but I think one’s government should mandate that certain things are taught in every classroom. If I ever have kids I want them to learn about the Revolutionary War in the United States no matter what school they attend in the U.S.Still, I have no idea what anyone is talking about, when it comes to Venezuela. Has the U.S. mainstream media really forged our minds trusting unflinching globs of grey matter? Why aren’t we asking questions any longer? Why are we assuming everything is truth, and then using our own integrity to back up unfounded claims?Then the big news hit. My neighbors have decided to take a job in Venezuela, near the coast, teaching at a private school. I am so happy for them. First off, the job sounds spectacular, secondly I have a place to stay when I visit Venezuela! (Give me a break, I am from the U.S., self interest is a genetic trait.) It never crossed my mind that this was anything less than truly amazing. I was so excited I started telling everyone I knew, but when I told folks they stammered, and looked away from me.With a “Good for them, I know I couldn’t do it,” they quickly responded to me and changed the subject. What? Really? You can’t? Why not? We have all moved to Ecuador, quite possibly one of the most unstable countries in Latin America. They do not even use their own currency, the current president just hit his one year anniversary and people consider it a miracle, and the average income is under $500 a month! We can all live here in peace and harmony, but Venezuela is unheard of? It is one country to the north that quite possibly has one of the largest oil reserves on the planet, where people’s income increasing, and GDP is growing as well is incomprehensible? Really?I am just using these 3 points as examples on researchable facts. How it could be so much better here (in Ecuador) than there (in Venezuela.) And please do not get me wrong, I mean no slight toward Ecuador. I love my country of residence, and we are making great strides in progress here. Someday I’ll talk about those as well, but not today (talk about delving into irrationality.)One day my second graders told me “the U.S. is full of criminals with guns that shoot people all of the time.” I chastised my students for spreading false information, telling them to research before they speak in absolutes. I think about that memory when I hear my friends discussing Venezuela and I want to chastise all of us who assume without proof or even a follow up question. Our intelligence and discretion will always put us heads above others, but if we do not use these abilities in concert we might as well experience life through an artificial kaleidescope. It is pretty, fractured, and utterly fake. Life without understanding will condemn us to a future without hope.I would like to make sure that the people I have mentioned in this essay know that I mean absolutely no offense or disrespect to them. I have many other examples on people proceeding forward with few facts, but I trust the opinions and personalities of the people mentioned. This is why the impact of our conversations is much greater to me. I do not judge them, but use their statements as proof, that even some of our most gifted brethren are affected by the propaganda put forth by the ruling classes.   [...]

Leave a Reply

Please note: Comment moderation is currently enabled so there will be a delay between when you post your comment and when it shows up. Patience is a virtue; there is no need to re-submit your comment.

[SolidarityEconomy.net is proudly powered by WordPress.]