Archive for July, 2011

Construction: High Tech Meets High-Design

by @ Wednesday, July 27th, 2011. Filed under Green Industry, High Road Economics, Technology, Urban Problems

Renewable High Design Energy-Powered Housing Planned for Denmark

By Bridget Borgobello

July 18, 2011

10 Pictures

Proposed for the Aalborg Waterfront in Denmark, a new housing development would feature 60...

Proposed for the Aalborg Waterfront in Denmark, a new housing development would feature 60 apartments, from 4 to 12 stories high, all supplied with a 100 percent renewable energy source (Image by C. F. Moller Architects)

Image Gallery (10 images)

Proposed for the Aalborg Waterfront in Denmark, a new housing development would feature 60 apartments, from 4 to 12 stories high, all supplied with a 100 percent renewable energy source. This zero-energy project has been proposed by Scandinavian architectural firm C. F. Møller, in collaboration with energy consultants, Cenergia.

(more...)

email2friend

How High Design Does More with Less

by @ Friday, July 22nd, 2011. Filed under Green Energy, Green Industry, High Road Economics

 

Twice the height of the Empire State

EnviroMission plans Massive

Solar Tower for Arizona

By Loz Blain

SolidarityEconomy.net via Gizmag.com

July 21, 2011

EnviroMission's solar tower: coming to Arizona in 2015

EnviroMission's solar tower: coming to Arizona in 2015

An ambitious solar energy project on a massive scale is about to get underway in the Arizona desert. EnviroMission is undergoing land acquisition and site-specific engineering to build its first full-scale solar tower - and when we say full-scale, we mean it! The mammoth 800-plus meter (2625 ft) tall tower will instantly become one of the world's tallest buildings. Its 200-megawatt power generation capacity will reliably feed the grid with enough power for 150,000 US homes, and once it's built, it can be expected to more or less sit there producing clean, renewable power with virtually no maintenance until it's more than 80 years old. In the video after the jump, EnviroMission CEO Roger Davey explains the solar tower technology, the Arizona project and why he couldn't get it built at home in Australia.

  • EnviroMission's solar tower: coming to Arizona in 2015
  • EnviroMission's solar tower: coming to Arizona in 2015
  • EnviroMission's solar tower: coming to Arizona in 2015
  • EnviroMission's solar tower: coming to Arizona in 2015
  • How Solar Towers Work

Enviromission's solar tower is a simple idea taken to gigantic proportions. The sun beats down on a large covered greenhouse area at the bottom, warming the air underneath it. Hot air wants to rise, so there's a central point for it to rush towards and escape; the tower in the middle. And there's a bunch of turbines at the base of the tower that generate electricity from that natural updraft.

It's hard to envisage that sort of system working effectively until you tweak the temperature variables and scale the whole thing up. Put this tower in a hot desert area, where the daytime surface temperature sits at around 40 degrees Celsius (104 F), and add in the greenhouse effect and you've got a temperature under your collector somewhere around 80-90 degrees (176-194 F). Scale your collector greenhouse out to a several hundred-meter radius around the tower, and you're generating a substantial volume of hot air.

Then, raise that tower up so that it's hundreds of meters in the air - because for every hundred metres you go up from the surface, the ambient temperature drops by about 1 degree. The greater the temperature differential, the harder the tower sucks up that hot air at the bottom - and the more energy you can generate through the turbines.

    The advantages of this kind of power source are clear:

  • Because it works on temperature differential, not absolute temperature, it works in any weather;
  • Because the heat of the day warms the ground up so much, it continues working at night;
  • Because you want large tracts of hot, dry land for best results, you can build it on more or less useless land in the desert;
  • It requires virtually no maintenance - apart from a bit of turbine servicing now and then, the tower "just works" once it's going, and lasts as long as its structure stays standing;
  • It uses no 'feed stock' - no coal, no uranium, nothing but air and sunlight;
  • It emits absolutely no pollution - the only emission is warm air at the top of the tower. In fact, because you're creating a greenhouse underneath, it actually turns out to be remarkably good for growing vegetation under there.

The Arizona Project

While this is not the first solar tower that has been built (a small-scale test rig in Spain proved the technology more than a decade ago) EnviroMission has chosen to build its first full-scale power plant in the deserts of Arizona, USA.

The Arizona tower will be a staggering 800 metres or so tall - just 30 meters shorter than the colossal Burj Khalifa in Dubai, the world's tallest man-made structure. To put that in context - it will stand more than double the height of the Empire State building in New York City, and it'll be as much as 130 meters in diameter at the top. Truly a gigantic structure.

Currently undergoing site-specific engineering and land acquisition, EnviroMission estimates the tower will cost around US$750 million to build. It will generate a peak of 200 megawatts, and run at an efficiency of around 60% - vastly more efficient and reliable than other renewable energy sources.

The output has already been pre-sold - the Southern California Public Power Authority recently signed a 30-year power purchase agreement with EnviroMission that will effectively allow the tower to provide enough energy for an estimated 150,000 US homes. Financial modelling projects that the tower will pay off its purchase price in just 11 years - and the engineering team are shooting for a structure that will stand for 80 years or more.

Considering that a large city like Los Angeles requires total power in the region of 7,200 megawatts, you'd have to build a few dozen solar towers up to the same size as the Arizona project if you wanted to completely replace the existing, primarily coal-based energy supply for that city's 3.7 million-odd residents. So it's not an instant solution - but then, its short projected payback period and virtually zero operating costs make it a very sound economic proposition that competes favorably against other renewable sources.

Under the terms of the pre-purchase agreement, the Arizona tower is due to begin delivering power at the start of 2015. Watch this space!



email2friend

Why Not Solar Installers as Worker Coops?

by @ Thursday, July 21st, 2011. Filed under Green Energy, Green Industry, Solidarity Economy

Solar Is Making Cents

in San Antonio, Texas

By Emily Simone
SolidarityEconomy.net via ApolloAlliance.org

July 20, 2011 - Solar San Antonio, a local nonprofit solar energy advocacy organization, began its Bring Solar Home campaign in the fall of 2010, after the Department of Energy (DOE) designated San Antonio as a Solar America city. Although the DOE identified San Antonio as a good candidate for solar energy investment, “the two major barriers were the high up-front cost of solar and lack of information,” explains Lanny Sinkin, Solar San Antonio’s executive director; “the Bring Solar Home campaign is designed to overcome both of these barriers.”

“Bring Solar Home” is an initiative to introduce homeowners to solar installation businesses and provide consumers with information and advice to help them make decisions about installing home solar units. Solar San Antonio’s Bring Solar Home campaign connects a homeowner’s application for home installation to a number of installers, and narrows down the bid to three companies.

There are three requirements of the installation companies contracted for residential installations. First, the company must be pre-approved by the city’s municipal utility, CPS Energy. Second, the installer must be a member of Solar San Antonio. Third, it must sign an agreement outlining the company’s involvement with the larger Bring Solar Home campaign. Once an installation is complete, it is inspected by the city and the utility. “We also monitor each project and how it’s doing to make sure it’s a good experience for the customer,” Mr. Sinkin explains.

Home solar installation presents a high up-front cost, and this barrier is one of the main challenges to Bring Solar Home’s goals for San Antonio’s homes. The average installation costs $25,000-$27,000. “Solar PV pays for itself in 8-10 years and last for about 25-30 years,” explains Sinkin. Solar photovoltaic panels are just one method of capturing solar energy. Mr. Sinkin notes, “solar hot water costs much less than an electric water heater, and it pays for itself in fewer than three years.”

(more...)

email2friend

The Energy ‘Low Roaders’ vs. New Jobs

by @ Tuesday, July 19th, 2011. Filed under Environment, Green Energy, High Road Economics

Koch Brothers Declare War on Offshore Wind

By Keith Harrington
SolidarityEconomy.net via grist.org

July 15, 2011 - The Koch brothers have now turned their firepower against offshore wind. The war over America’s coastal-energy future has officially begun, and the result could determine whether we see wind turbines or catastrophic oil spills along our coastlines in coming years.

The opening salvo came in early July, when everyone’s favorite climate-hating, fossil-fuel-loving industrialist villains, the Koch brothers, released a so-called “cost-benefit analysis” of New Jersey offshore wind development plans through their front group Americans for Prosperity.

The focus on New Jersey is no big surprise. Fresh off their recent success in manipulating the state’s Republican Gov. Chris Christie into backing out of the Northeastern cap-and-trade system known as RGGI, the brothers grim are honing in on what they see as a weak spot in the clean-energy movement’s eastern front. Hoping to score a knockout blow, the duo have packed their offshore wind "analysis" with distortions.

Topping the report’s list of misrepresented facts are the jobs benefits. In fact, forget about misrepresentation; the report actually failed to represent those benefits altogether. Considering the impressive job-creation numbers cited in a range of other studies on offshore wind, it’s hard to imagine how any analysis that wasn’t commissioned as an intentional piece of fiction could have made such a glaring omission. Indeed, a study by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory indicates that the 1,000 megawatts of offshore wind power New Jersey is planning to build could result in nearly 5,000 construction and maintenance jobs. Adding to the imbalance of the Kochs' equations, their report completely discounts wind power’s benefit as a relief valve against foreign-oil dependence or New Jersey’s need to import electricity from other states.

(more...)

email2friend

Is Wider Unity on the Shale Issue Possible?

by @ Thursday, July 14th, 2011. Filed under Environment, Green Energy, Trade Unions

A Stronger Steelworkers’ Voice Is Needed

in the Marcellus Anti-Fracking Movement

A Stronger Steelworkers’ Voice Is Needed

in the Marcellus Shale Anti-Fracking Movement

By Carl Davidson
Beaver County Blue

There’s a specter haunting Western PA. It’s the prospect of a working class divided by a fear of water pollution destroying the property values of small homeowners on one side, and on the other side, by the promise of new wealth from the exploitation of natural gas in the Marcellus and Utica shale deposits.

A similar fear divides West Virginians over ‘mountaintop removal’ mining. Little towns are split between those who want food on the table and those fearful of poisoning their children.

Steelworkers can certainly see the problem in our own terms. It takes a lot of steel pipe to drill down two to four miles, then drill out a horizontally for another mile in a dozen directions. The tube mills are getting the orders and steelworkers are back to work. On the other hand, steelworkers know the dangers of poisoning the ground and the rivers better than most.

(more...)

email2friend

Worker Cooperatives, Chinese Style

by @ Tuesday, July 12th, 2011. Filed under China, Socialism

Huaxi Coop: Sharing the Wealth and

Living Large in a Tiny Chinese Village

By MICHAEL WINES

SolidarityEconomy.net via New York times
Published: July 11, 2011

HUAXI, China — Ask not why the citizens of this village of 2,000, a few hours by car northwest of Shanghai, have built a 74-story skyscraper next to their prim town square. Everybody in China knows the answer: it is another step in their plan to create the communist utopia envisioned by Mao. The skyscraper will include a five-star hotel, upscale shopping mall, revolving restaurant and five life-size statues of a water buffalo, Huaxi’s symbol.

The utopia part certainly seems plausible. Whether Mao would have approved is a bit more in doubt.

Huaxi’s so-called New Village in the Sky — at 1,076 feet, a bit taller than the Chrysler Building in Manhattan — is getting finishing touches this summer in preparation for an October opening. Among other attractions, it will have a five-star hotel, a gold-leaf-embellished concert hall, an upscale shopping mall and what is billed as Asia’s largest revolving restaurant. Also, it will have five life-size statues of a water buffalo, Huaxi’s symbol, on every 12th floor or so.

That this half-billion-dollar edifice is a good 40-minute drive from a city of any size is part of the plan. For though not many foreigners have heard of Huaxi, Chinese far and wide know it as the socialist collective that works — the village where public ownership of the means of production has not just made everyone equal, but rich, too.

Two million tourists come annually to view the Huaxi marvel, no small number of them officials from other villages who yearn to know how Huaxi did it. The enormous skyscraper, topped with a gigantic gold sphere, will never win architectural awards. But it will add to Huaxi’s allure, the village fathers confidently predict — and soak up tourist money as well.

“We call it the three-increase building,” said Wu Renbao, 84, the town’s revered patriarch, meaning that it will increase Huaxi’s acreage (by half), increase its work force (by 3,000) and, hardly least of all, increase its wealth.

If he is right, all 2,000 villagers will get a little richer. They all own a piece of the building — just as they own the town’s steel mill, textile factory, greenhouse complex, ocean shipping company and other ventures. That is Huaxi’s carefully curated narrative: by rigidly adhering to socialism with Chinese characteristics, the citizens of this little village have created an oasis of prosperity and comfort that is the envy of the world.

(more...)

email2friend

InfoGraph of the Day: Arab Rising

by @ Monday, July 4th, 2011. Filed under Arabs, Energy, Middle East

One Picture, One Thousand Words



email2friend

[SolidarityEconomy.net is proudly powered by WordPress.]