Archive for the 'Labor Movement' Category

Workers Discuss ‘Workers Control’ and the Socialist Path in Venezuela

by @ Thursday, July 15th, 2010. Filed under Economic Democracy, Labor Movement, Latin America, Socialism

from Venezuela Analysis

Workers’ Control and the

Contradictions of the Bolivarian Process

Interview with Gustavo Martínez

By Susan Spronk, Jeffery R. Webber

On June 10, 2010 we caught up with Gustavo Martinez, a union leader in the worker-controlled nationalized coffee company, Fama de América, in Caracas, Venezuela. The company has 350 workers at the national level, with two separate plants – one in Caracas and one in Valencia. We sat down with Martínez to discuss the centrality of workers’ control in the ongoing struggle to transition toward socialism and some of the most pressing contradictions of the Bolivarian process in Venezuela today.

To start off, can you tell us your name, how long you’ve worked in this coffee company, your job in the company, and your role in the union?

My name is Gustavo Martínez. I’m a union leader in Fama de América. I’ve worked here for nine years. I started in 2001. As you would expect, when I started there, Fama de América was a private enterprise, characterized by exploitation of the workers and rampant corruption. The owners of the enterprise, as capitalists, were only interested in extracting surplus; they didn’t care about the conditions of the workers. All of these characteristics we already know about capitalism.

There was a union at the time, first established in 1978, that was controlled by the [centre-right] party, Acción Democrática(Democratic Action, AD). Logically, as people on the left we were opposed to the union. I was one of those on the left. My parents are Colombian, and my father was a militant in the Communist Party in that country. He was pushed out of Colombia, displaced economically and politically, and therefore moved the family to Venezuela. He worked for a transnational and faced death threats for his political organizing in the workplace.

So I found myself here in Venezuela, working at the company, and there were others with a revolutionary background working here too.

(more...)

email2friend

Randy Shannon: The Case for Full Employment

by @ Wednesday, June 9th, 2010. Filed under Economic Democracy, Economy, Labor Movement

It’s Time to Fight

for Full Employment!

The Progressive Path

Out of Our Crisis

A Project of the Labor Committee of CCDS

The Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism

www.cc-ds.org

 

The Struggle for Full Employment:

A Strategy to Defeat the Neoliberal Assault

on the US Working Class

by Randy Shannon

Treasurer, PA 4th CD Chapter,

Progressive Democrats of America

----------------------------------------------------------------

“In our day these economic truths have become accepted as self-evident. We have accepted, so to speak, a second Bill of Rights under which a new basis of security and prosperity can be established for all—regardless of station, race, or creed.

Among these are:

The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the nation;”

- President Franklin D. Roosevelt: State of the Union Address, January 11, 1944

------------------------------------------------------------------------

“Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favorable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment.”

- United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, December 10, 1948

I. Introduction

The “Great Recession” that began in 2007 has caused the greatest percent of job losses since the Great Depression of 1929. This crisis is the end of an era of unrestrained ‘neo-liberal’ capitalism that became public policy during the Reagan administration. The crisis marks a new level of instability with the growth of a global financial elite that targeted US workers and our trade unions after World War II.

The election of President Obama reflected the growing struggle of America’s progressive majority to reverse the neo-liberal policy of war and austerity that has undermined the social advances established by the New Deal and the United Nations. It also begins a long period of readjustment for capitalism as it responds to multiple crises, struggles to maintain its system of social control, and seeks a new system of profit accumulation.

Serial Crises

During the seven decades since World War II, US workers have faced ten periods during which the economy lost jobs for over twelve months. Each successive recession in employment lasted longer than the previous downturn.

In the above chart, each line represents an employment crisis since World War II. The vertical axis shows the percent of jobs lost each month and the horizontal axis shows the duration of the crisis in months since the last peak in employment. The right end of each line is the point at which employment returned to its former high.

In the crisis of 1990 the economy lost jobs for two and one half years. Then in the 2001 recession, it was four years before job losses ended. Although these last two downturns were prolonged, and the recoveries were weak, job losses at around 2% were not enough to cause widespread protest.

(more...)

email2friend

The Mosaic Left: Making Alliances With and Beyond the Unions

by @ Wednesday, May 26th, 2010. Filed under Financial Crisis, Labor Movement, Organizing

Contradictions of the Mosaic Left:

Perspectives for Protests within the Crisis

 

25. Mai 2010

By Florian Becker & Christina Kaindl
http://www.zeitschrift-luxemburg.de/

 

'There is no question that immediate economic crises can in themselves not bring about fundamental changes; they can only prepare more favorable ground for the diffusion of certain approaches for thinking through, posing and solving, the questions that are decisive for the whole further development of the life of the state. ' – Antonio Gramsci, Analysis of the Situation: Relations of Force. Prison Notebooks, 13th Notebook, § 17

 

When the public became aware of the economic crisis through the collapse of some of the big banks in the Fall of 2008, it took a while before the left and social movements took up the challenge of posing fundamental questions, of shifting “the further development of the life of the state” (Gramsci). Neoliberalism’s legitimation was undermined; still, the question of whether capitalism itself was in crisis was more typically discussed in bourgeois Sunday supplements than in influential groundbreaking strategy papers of the left and social movements.

The left was caught by surprise by the scale of the crisis, and its initial silence shows that analyses, policies and politics were hardly conceived in such a way that its own concepts could become practicable [=wirklich] (or even germane).

Left critique was strong where it addressed the manifestations of the crisis of the neoliberal model of politics and socialization, and stood on the side of the excluded and the surplus population [der Überflüssigen]. There was a lively and forceful critique of the social costs of neoliberalism. In 2003, a (fragile) anti-neoliberal bloc could be organized, in which left wings of trade-unions, anti-Hartz IV protests, the global-justice movement, critical intellectuals and the party Die LINKE formulated – despite all the differences between them – a critique of neoliberalism with a common direction.

(more...)

email2friend

Wave Power Collaboratives Offer Jobs and Green Energy

by @ Saturday, April 24th, 2010. Filed under Environment, High Road Economics, Labor Movement

 

Wave Power Potential:

A Whole New 'Cool'

for West Coast Surf Lovers

 

By Ron Ruggiero

Apollo News Service
April 14, 2010

If you mention “West Coast” and “waves” in the same sentence, most people think of tanned, Bermuda shorts-clad California surfers.

The work of Clackamas-based Oregon Iron Works (OIW) could change that in the coming years.

Oregon Iron Works is building the first-ever commercial wave energy system in North America. In December 2009, Ocean Power Technologies, a renewable energy company that specializes in wave-powered electricity generation, awarded Oregon Iron Works a contract to build buoys for its latest project off the coast of Reedsport, Oregon. Phase one of the project includes the production and installation of one “PowerBuoy,” while phase two includes an expected nine additional buoys that, when finished, will generate 1.5 megawatts of electricity.

Though today’s wind farms and solar arrays generate much more power than a small array of buoys, this project is an important stepping stone in the development of wave-power technology. According to David Gibson, project manager for Oregon Iron Works, “Wave energy is about where wind was 20 to 30 years ago. So, there will be a long curve in improvement as we develop wave systems. The United States is very good at innovation. This is an opportunity for us to step up and make an enormous contribution to the development of this new technology.”

(more...)

email2friend

Overcoming the Rift Between Worker Coops and the Labor Left

by @ Monday, January 4th, 2010. Filed under Economic Democracy, Labor Movement

'Sovereignty of Labor:'

A Deeper Look at the

Mondragon Principles

A series on the core principles of

the Mondragon Cooperatives in Spain

By John McNamara

http://www.cooperativeconsult.com

The Mondragon principle “Sovereignty of Labor” created departure from the cooperative movement. While the Rochdale Pioneers had good intentions, they abandoned worker cooperation in the 1870’s. The Fabian Socialist moved even further from the ideals of Robert Owen declaring consumerism as the lowest common denominator for human relationships eschewing workers as merely another stakeholder group. Even the French cooperativist Charles Gide turned away from worker associations. Sadly, this act left the labor movement adrift from the cooperative world even as organizations such as the Industrial Workers of the World and the Congress of Industrial Organizations developed worldviews akin to the ideal of cooperation.

In the US, as in most of the Capitalist dominated world, the idea of labor being sovereign is almost non-existent. Business schools spend a lot of money teaching future managers how to manage workers—increase their productivity and the companies profits Except in the more enlightened firms, managers treat workers as errant children. Likewise, the dominant culture makes work something to be avoided and champions obstruction as “fighting the man”. People who do work hard tend to be treated as suck-ups and “upwardly mobile”. We mock the Ragged Dick stories in which “by luck and by pluck and good boy may succeed”. We have been conditioned to hate work and to distrust anyone who suggests that we work hard. The wobblies ran a cartoon called Blockhead who ridiculed the “company man”.

(more...)

email2friend

Jobs Campaigns, New Deal History, National Service and Socialist Values

by @ Tuesday, December 29th, 2009. Filed under Economic Democracy, Economy, Labor Movement, Organizing, Socialism

A Left Role, Renewed Identity,

and How-To, in Campaigns for

National Service Jobs Programs

 

By John Case

Socialist-Economics Group

 

Does the current crisis justify an expanded role for government as an employer of last result?

Consider the following facts from EPI research:

Number unemployed: 15.4 million (up from 7.5 million in December 2007) Portion of official unemployed considered structural: 3.9 million Portion of unemployed who have been jobless more than six months: 38.3% Total jobs lost during the recession: 8.0 million Jobs needed to return to pre-recession unemployment rate: 10.9 million Number of job-seekers per job opening: 6.1 Unemployment rate: 10.0% Underemployment rate: 17.2%; Share of workers un- or underemployed: more than 1 in 6 States with double-digit unemployment in October, 2009: 15 White unemployment: 9.3%; African-American unemployment: 15.6%; Hispanic unemployment:12.7% Manufacturing jobs lost since the start of the recession: 2.1 million (15.5% of sector's jobs) Construction jobs lost in the recession: 1.6 million (20.8%, nearly one in five construction jobs) Mass layoffs (50 or more people by a single employer) in October 2009: 2,127; jobs lost:217,182 Under- and unemployed, marginally attached and involuntary part-time workers: 26.9 million

Americans with no health insurance in 2008: 46.3 million Annual Social Security benefit for average retiree: $13,922; Share of older Americans receiving all their income from Social Security: more than 1 out of 4 Number of children in poverty in 2008: 14.1 million (over one-third) Drop in real median income from 2007 to 2008: 3.6% (largest one-year drop since 1967) Growth rate of nominal, hourly wages of production workers over the last three months:1.7% Additional people covered by Medicaid/SCHIP in 2008: 3 million

Not since the Great Depression has structural unemployment been so intense or sustained. Despite faster and smarter liquidity and fiscal efforts by government than occurred then, employment decline has merely decelerated 24 months into what is now dubbed 'The Great Recession'. It is not yet near enough to avert 5-10 years of unemployment rates above 6% (the level at which the 'Great Recession' started). The foundation of New Deal anti-depression actions, and one of the most successful and long lasting in its effects, was directly putting men to work in public works projects that became associated with several national service programs. The economist Hyman Minsky coined the term 'Employer of Last Resort' to describe government full employment efforts, which were part of his economic prescription, discussed more below, for countering capitalism's inherent vulnerability to financial instability.

This article explores the appropriateness, precedents and how-to's of national service programs (the chief US version of employer of last resort). in responding to the current crisis. The moral and social virtues of putting the unemployed to work in the creation of useful and meaningful public goods, instead of subjecting them to sustained idleness, should be self-evident.

(more...)

email2friend

Naomi Klein Under Fire Over Worker Coops

by @ Thursday, September 3rd, 2009. Filed under Economic Democracy, Labor Movement, Organizing

 

 Fire the Boss!

Hostile Business Reaction as

Workers' Co-ops Gain Visibility

 

By Hazel Corcoran

Executive Director

Canadian Worker Co-op Federation

 

Aug 31, 2009 - Naomi Klein and Avi Lewis, Canadians who made the film 'The Take' in 2004 about worker takeovers in Argentina, are at it again.

In their recent blog posting called "The Cure for Layoffs: Fire the Boss!", they passionately made the case for hostile worker takeovers as a response to the economic crisis. Although they mention worker co-operatives generally, their focus is on mainly on protests, "bossnappings", sit-ins and the like.

CanWest newspapers printed the attack on Klein and Lewis' article without ever having printed the article itself.

Evidently, they touched a nerve. Philosophy professor Joseph Heath wrote an opinion piece in response which appeared in at least four Canadian daily newspapers: "Economics for lefties: Co-ops sound great if you hate big corporations. Not so great if you care about how they work in real life".

Oddly enough, CanWest newspapers printed Heath's response without ever having printed the original Klein and Lewis article. Heath states that, "Klein and Lewis, I must admit, make me a bit crazy. … They blame problems on totally fictitious causes, then recommend solutions that are guaranteed not to work. Like co-ops. … Co-ops are not a 'cure for layoffs.' They cause unemployment."

Co-op supporters should laugh at his ire, not cry. As Gandhi said: "First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." If we believe this, then we are three-quarters of the way there!

Of course in the co-operative way, if "we" win, everybody wins. The point would be to get away from having winners and losers. Co-ops are about creating an economy in which people matter more than profit; in which we create an environment in which people are free to discover the gifts that they bring to this world and have a way to develop them and contribute them to the common good.

Canadian co-operators responded vociferously to Heath's opinion piece through various letters to the editor, refuting every point. You can see some of these letters printed as comments at the bottom of the Ottawa Citizen site.

In fact, Heath's argument is refuted by the full scope of the worker co-op movement which has arisen around the world. In Europe, for example, there are approximately 50,000 worker co-ops with more than 1.4 million worker-owners. Many are manufacturing businesses. In the region in and around Mondragon, Spain, where the economy is based on worker co-operatives, there is lower unemployment than in other regions of Spain.

CICOPA (the International Organisation of Industrial, Artisanal and Service Producers' Co-operatives, which promotes worker co-operatives) notes that "in France alone, in 2007, there were 70 cases of business transfers to employees." The European Parliament has recently passed a resolution in favour of the social economy, which supports business transfer to co-operatives, 580 votes to 27 with 44 abstentions. The success of worker co-operatives, especially in Europe demonstrates the great potential there is for North American workers.

In Canada, legendary labour leader Lynn Williams spoke at the founding meeting of the Western Labour-Worker Co-op Council in September 2006, which has become an active and thriving organization, as reported in the first issue of Work Together. Similar efforts are underway in the US, with a conference on labour solidarity and worker co-ops held in early August, 2009.

"People are absolutely starving for alternatives to our broken system," as Avi Lewis said in his speech at the Canadian Co-operative Association Congress several years ago. He went on, "But they aren't getting them – they don't know about them — and that's where Co-operators will either seize the moment, or watch history pass us by. … It is, after all, when the market fails that co-operatives have historically come to the rescue of communities, economic sectors, even whole ways of life...

"[T]his is both a major challenge and a huge opportunity for you as co-operators right here in Canada. These sites of creative resistance, of urgent struggle and deep co-operation are often not even on the radar…. They need to be."

Even staunch free-marketers like Joseph Heath have to admit that the current economic system is broken. (Well, he doesn't, in this article, but most observers do.) Gandhi also said that wealth without work and commerce without morality are two of the seven worldly sins. Perhaps that's why the free-market capitalist economy broke down.

We need to not only fix it but to replace it with another, co-operative economy whose basic goal is to meet human needs. The stories about co-operatives in Europe and Argentina and around the world demonstrate the worker co-operative movement (even the whole co-operative movement) can be an effective response to the global economic crisis.

But the co-op story needs to reach the public, through voices such as those of Naomi Klein and Avi Lewis, who speak and write with passion and eloquence. We need more public champions, particularly at a time when the corporate-controlled media are spreading misleading, negative information about the worker co-op and broader co-op movements.

If Gandhi was right, then defensive (not to say defamatory) articles in business media are a promising sign. In Avi Lewis' words, at least we are "on the radar". Let us seize the opportunity to use all the networks and smaller media available to us, to highlight the practical steps being taken by activists working in the field. Then, indeed, we may be more than three-quarters of the way to overcoming our broken and exploitive economic system.



email2friend

Reportback: 5th Eastern Conference On Workplace Democracy

by @ Sunday, August 9th, 2009. Filed under Economic Democracy, Labor Movement, Socialism

 

  Worker and Community

Coops Gather in Rust Belt

Pittsburgh to Build Solidarity

 

By Carl Davidson

SolidarityEconomy.Net

Nearly 200 cooperative economy advocates gathered at Duquesne University in Pittsburgh, PA over the July 30-Aug.2 weekend. They took stock of themselves, learned from each other, and, in the midst of economic crisis, celebrated new growth and interest in their cause.

It was the 5th Eastern Conference for Workplace Democracy (ECWD), itself an affiliate of the U.S. Federation of Worker Cooperatives. Worker cooperatives are in turn only one sector of a much wider array of consumer, housing, producer, credit union and utility cooperatives spread across the country. Organizers and representatives of all of these also took part in the conference, and they came from 21 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and Canada.

“Democracy Works: Workers Cooperatives, Labor Solidarity and Sustainability” was the overall theme. The event was co-hosted by the Pittsburgh Coalition of Black Trade Unionists, the Ohio Employee Ownership Center and the Small Planet Institute, along with dozens of participating organizations.

(more...)

email2friend

‘Buy Out, Not Bail Out’ – Coops as a Working Class Solution

by @ Saturday, April 25th, 2009. Filed under Economic Democracy, Financial Crisis, Labor Movement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Photo: Ontario's Algoma Steel, a 5000 worker cooperative

Coops and the global financial crisis

Cooperatives have been more resilient to the deepening global economic and jobs crisis than other sectors. ILO Online spoke with Hagen Henry, chief of the ILO’s Cooperatives Branch.

The ILO is the International Labor Organization, created in 1919, as part of the Treaty of Versailles that ended World War I, to reflect the belief that universal and lasting peace can be accomplished only if it is based on social justice. The ILO brings together governments, workers and employers, as the world's only tripartite multilateral agency. It is dedicated to bringing decent work and livelihoods, job-related security and better living standards to the people of both poor and rich countries.

ILO Online: Why does the ILO promote cooperatives?

Hagen Henry: The ILO views cooperatives as important in improving the living and working conditions of women and men globally as well as making essential infrastructure and services available even in areas neglected by the state and investor-driven enterprises. Moreover, values that are at the heart of the cooperative movement are central to creating decent jobs. Cooperatives are close to a democratic, people-centred economy which cares for the environment, while promoting economic growth, social justice and fair globalization. Cooperatives play an increasingly important role in balancing economic, social and environmental concerns as well as in contributing to poverty prevention and reduction.

(more...)

email2friend

Danger: Pushing ‘Recovery’ with a ‘White’ Top and a Black Bottom

by @ Thursday, April 23rd, 2009. Filed under African-American, Economic Democracy, Labor Movement, Racism

Economic Recovery for Everyone:

Racial Equity and Prosperity

 


by The Center for Social Inclusion

Published by POVERTY & RACE
RESEARCH ACTION COUNCIL
March/April 2009
Volume 18: Number 2


States are poised to receive significant federal funding to stimulate the economy and put people back to work. Much of it targets “shovel ready” projects. Government has to be smart about how it uses our money. The stimulus package alone will not be enough to put everyone who needs a job back to work. And it will not support all the services our communities need. But if it is allocated wisely and fairly, it can be a powerful boost to the economy and improve the lives of many.


To do that, states must ensure that those in the most need benefit from the stimulus. While we have made much progress on race and gender equality in this country, we have not yet achieved full fairness, and these inequities limit prosperity for all of us.

(more...)

email2friend

Mike Davis on the Crisis, Obama, FDR and Socialism Today

by @ Saturday, March 28th, 2009. Filed under Economic Democracy, Economy, Labor Movement, Socialism

 

Bill Moyers Talks
With Mike Davis
on the Economic Crisis

 

March 20, 2009

BILL MOYERS: For all the talk on the cable channels and in the blogosphere, you would think Washington has been invaded and conquered. Remember that scary movie from the 1950’s, INVASION OF THE BODY SNATCHERS? MALE VOICE: Everyone! They’re here already! You’re next! You’re next!

Many film scholars believe the movie is a paranoid parable, warning of a Communist takeover of America. But today, the body snatchers are you ready for this? Socialists! That’s right. Socialists, reportedly swarming over the city and making off with the means of production, namely the Federal budget. I’m not making this up. Newsweek was the first to spot the aliens a month ago and it was us. Here’s the headline of a recent article on Salon.com. Newt Gingrich, reincarnated once again as himself, sounds as if Obama ate his Contract with America for lunch and coughed it up as “European Socialism.”

(more...)

email2friend

Anti-Immigrant in Black Face?

by @ Tuesday, May 29th, 2007. Filed under African-American, Economy, Labor Movement
Advertisement for the 'Coalition for the Future American Worker'The picture in the ad immediately caught my attention. The photo was of a very dignified older African American man looking into the camera, very determined and equally pensive. Underneath his photo was a caption giving his name—T. Willard Fair—and the fact that he was the veteran of 40 years of struggle in the Civil Rights Movement. This was certainly enough to pique my interest. Beneath the caption was a statement declaring that the alleged threat to African Americans comes from documented and undocumented immigrants. He went on to suggest that any notion of legalizing undocumented workers was a slap in the face of African Americans. The ad is associated with a group called the “Coalition for the Future American Worker.” Fair’s attack is not surprising, although the virulence and historical nature of it is very unsettling, particularly because it is bound to strike a chord among many African Americans. Black America has been taking a prolonged economic hit since the mid 1970s. The economic reorganization which many people call de-industrialization has had a devastating impact on the (more...)

email2friend

Do Unions Have a Future?

by @ Tuesday, January 16th, 2007. Filed under Economic Democracy, Globalization, Labor Movement
Australian Prime Minister John HowardMax Ogden, SolidarityEconomy.net January 16, 2007, Australia With acknowledgements for helpful comments – Dave Davies, Dave Feickert, and Greg Pettiona The Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) has led a very fine campaign against the reactionary industrial relations legislation and is winning the public debate. However in the long term the union movement needs to add another important dimension to its strategy, if it is not only to regain and increase membership and the critical role that a (more...)

email2friend

Worker-Owners and Unions: Why Can’t We Just Get Along?

by @ Wednesday, October 18th, 2006. Filed under Economic Democracy, High Road Economics, Labor Movement
Worker-owners at Colors, NYCYou have probably heard the story of the scorpion that convinces a frog to carry it across a river. Halfway across, the scorpion stings the frog, which means both will drown. The frog does not understand; the scorpion explains, "I couldn't help myself. It's my nature." In the abstract, worker-owned enterprises and labor unions would appear to have much in common. Both share the goal of improving pay and working conditions. Both aim to give workers a say in the workplace. And both belong on any progressive's short list of strategies for building a more just economic system. But when unions and worker-owned businesses actually interact, they sometimes act more like the fabled arachnid. The Ohio Employee Ownership Center at Kent State, where I work, provides preliminary technical assistance on worker buyouts. I once met with a group of employees exploring a worker buyout of a failing paper mill in southwest Ohio. When I (more...)

email2friend

The People Vs. The Developers

by @ Sunday, October 8th, 2006. Filed under High Road Economics, Labor Movement
Affordable housing protest in NYCTenants’ Bid Among a Dozen for Complexes (original title)
A group aligned with tenants of Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village submitted a $4.5 billion bid yesterday to buy the 110 apartment buildings overlooking the East River in the hope of retaining the complexes as middle-income housing. Their offer was neither the highest nor the lowest in one of the biggest real estate auctions of all time. Metropolitan Life, the company that built Peter Cooper Village and Stuyvesant Town in 1947 for returning veterans, got roughly a dozen offers by its 3 p.m. deadline yesterday, ranging from $4.3 billion to slightly more than $5 billion, according to real estate executives. (more...)

email2friend

[SolidarityEconomy.net is proudly powered by WordPress.]