Archive for the 'Marxism' Category

People’s Plebiscites as a Method of Struggle

by @ Tuesday, August 25th, 2009. Filed under Marxism, Organizing, Socialism

  Popular Consultations: Space for

the Convergence of Different Forces

The Case of Uruguay's  Frente Amplio.

By Marta Harnecker

Translated by Federico Fuentes

for Links: International Journal of Socialist Renewal

[This is the eleventh in a series of regular articles.]

1. I have previously argued the case for the need to create a large social bloc against neoliberalism that can unite all those affected by the system. To achieve this, it is fundamental that we create spaces that allow for the convergence of specific anti-neoliberal struggles where, safeguarding the specific characteristics of each political or social actor, common tasks can be taken up that aid in strengthening the struggle.

2. In this respect, I think that popular consultations or plebiscites are very interesting spaces. These can allow us to mobilize behind a single concrete task of convincing -- undertaking door-to-door popular education -- a large number of people and youth who are beginning to awaken to politics, who want to contribute to a better world, who very often don’t know how to do it, and who are not willing to be active in the traditional way, because many of them reject politics and politicians.

(more...)

email2friend

Lessons from Struggle - Contend in All Spheres with the Logic of Solidarity

by @ Wednesday, August 5th, 2009. Filed under Marxism, Organizing, Socialism

 

 A Strategy for

Building Unity

 

 

By Marta Harnecker

translated by Federico Fuentes

for Links International Journal of Socialist Renewal

[This is the tenth in a series of regular articles. ]

 

1. I have previously referred to the necessity of building unity among all left forces and actors in order to be able to group a broad anti-neoliberal bloc around them. Nevertheless, I do not think that this objective can be achieved in a voluntarist manner, creating coordinating bodies from above that end up as simple sums of acronyms.

2. I believe that this unity can emerge through concrete struggles for common objectives. And that is why I think that we can help create better conditions for this unity if we put into practice a new strategy of anti-capitalist struggle.

3. We are talking about a strategy that takes into consideration the important social, political, economic and cultural transformations that have occurred across the world in the last period. One that understands that the new forms of capitalist domination go far beyond the economic and state sphere and have infiltrated into all the interstices of society, fundamentally through the mass media which has indiscriminately invaded the homes of all social sectors, and in doing so changed the conditions of struggle.

(more...)

email2friend

Building Organizations with Unity Resting on Diversity

by @ Sunday, July 19th, 2009. Filed under Marxism, Organizing, Socialism

 

 Respect Differences

and Be Flexible in

Regards to Activism

 

 

By Marta Harnecker

Translated by Federico Fuentes

for Links International Journal of Socialist Renewal

 

[This is the ninth in a series of regular articles.]

1. Among the left, there continues to be a difficulty to work together while respecting differences. In the past, the tendency of political organizations, especially parties that self-declare themselves as parties of the working class, was always towards homogenizing the social base within which they carried out political work. If this attitude was once justified due to the past identity and homogeneity of the working class, today it is anachronistic when confronted with a working class that is quite differentiated, and with the emergence of a diversity of new social actors. Today, we increasingly have to deal with a unity based on diversity, on respect for ethnic and cultural differences, for gender and for the sense of belonging of specific collectives.

2. It is necessary to try channelling commitments to activism by starting with the actual potential of each sector, and even of each person, that is willing to commit itself to the struggle, without seeking to homogenize these actors. It is important to have a special sensibility towards finding all those points of agreement that can allow for the emergence of a common platform of struggle.

(more...)

email2friend

Lessons from Struggle: Setting the Direction for Change

by @ Saturday, July 11th, 2009. Filed under Marxism, Organizing, Socialism

 

  The Left Must

Try to Set the

Agenda for Struggle

 

By Marta Harnecker

Translated by Federico Fuentes

for Links International Journal of Socialist Renewal

[This is the eighth in a series of regular articles.]

1. In the previous article, we stated that a large section of the party left has found it very difficult to work with social movements and develop ties with the new social forces in recent decades. This has been due to several factors.

2. While the right wing has demonstrated great political initiative, the left tends to be on the defensive. While the former uses its control of the institutions of the state and the mass media, as well as its economic influence, to impose its new model, subservient to financial capital and monopolies, that has precipitated privatizations, labor deregulation and all the other aspects of the neoliberal economic program, to increase social fragmentation and foment anti-partyism, the party left, on the other hand, has almost exclusively limited its political work to the use of current institutionality, subordinating itself to the rules of the game imposed by the enemy, and hardly ever taking them by surprise. The level of absurdity is such that the calendar of struggle of the left is set by the right.

(more...)

email2friend

Ideas for Struggle: Authenticity as a Requirement for Mobilization

by @ Wednesday, July 1st, 2009. Filed under Marxism, Organizing, Politics & Elections, Socialism

 

  Reasons for Popular Skepticism

on Politics and Politicians

By Marta Harnecker

translated by Federico Fuentes

for Links International Journal of Socialist Renewal

[This is the seventh in a series of regular articles.]

1. In one of my previous articles, I stated that in order to wage an effective struggle against neoliberalism, it is necessary to unite all those suffering its consequences, and to achieve this objective we must start with the left itself, which in our countries tends to be very dispersed. But, there are many obstacles that impede this task. The first step to overcoming them is to be aware of them and be prepared to face them.

2. One of these obstacles is the growing popular skepticism regarding politics and politicians.

3. This has to do, among other things, with the great constraints that exist today in our democratic systems, which are very different to those that existed prior to the military dictatorships.

(more...)

email2friend

Lessons from Struggle: Forming the Anti-Neoliberal Social Bloc

by @ Thursday, June 25th, 2009. Filed under Marxism, Organizing, Socialism

 

  The Need to Unite

the Party Left and

the Social Left

 

By Marta Harnecker

translated by Federico Fuentes

for Links International Journal of Socialist Renewal

 

[This is the sixth in a series of regular articles. ]

1. The rejection by a majority of the people of the globalization model imposed on our continent intensifies each day given its inability to solve the most pressing problems of our people. Neoliberal policies implemented by large transnational financial capital, which is backed by a large military and media power, and whose hegemonic headquarters can be found in the United States, have not only been unable to resolve these problems but, on the contrary, have dramatically increased misery and social exclusion, while concentrating wealth in increasingly fewer hands.

2. Among those who have suffered most as a result of the economic consequences of neoliberalism are the traditional sectors of the urban and rural working classes. But its disastrous effects have also affected many other social sectors, such as the poor and marginalised, impoverished middle-class sectors, the constellation of small and medium-sized businesses, the informal sector, medium and small-scale rural producers, the majority of professionals, the legions of unemployed, workers in cooperatives, pensioners, the police and the subordinate cadres of the army (junior officers). Moreover, we should not only keep in mind those who are affected economically, but also all those who are discriminated and oppressed by the system: women, youth, children, the elderly, indigenous peoples, blacks, certain religious creeds, homosexuals, etc.

(more...)

email2friend

Lessons from Struggle: Building Organizations with a Democratic Culture

by @ Tuesday, June 23rd, 2009. Filed under Marxism, Organizing, Socialism

  Minorities

Can Be Right

By Marta Harnecker

translated by Federico Fuentes

for Links International Journal of Socialist Renewal

[This is the fifth in a series of regular articles.]

1. Democratic centralism implies not only the subordination of the minority to the majority, but also the respect of the majority towards the minority.

2. Minorities should not be crushed or marginalized; they should be respected. Nor should the minority be required to completely subordinate itself to the majority. The minority must carry out the tasks proposed by the majority at each concrete political junction, but they should not have to renounce their political, theoretical and ideological convictions. On the contrary, it is the minority’s duty to continue fighting to defend their ideas until the others are convinced or they themselves become convinced of the other’s ideas.

(more...)

email2friend

Lessons from the Struggle: Making the Case for Democratic Centralism

by @ Monday, June 22nd, 2009. Filed under Marxism, Organizing, Socialism

 

  Should we reject

bureaucratic centralism

and simply use consensus?

By Marta Harnecker

Translated by Federico Fuentes

for Links International Journal of Socialist Renewal

[This is the fourth in a series of regular articles.]

1. For a long time, left-wing parties operated along authoritarian lines. The usual practice was that of bureaucratic centralism, influenced by the experiences of Soviet socialism. All decisions regarding criterion, tasks, initiatives, and the course of political action to take were restricted to the party elite, without the participation or debate of the membership, who were limited to following orders that they never got to discuss and in many cases did not understand. For most people, such practices are increasing intolerable. (more...)

email2friend

Guidelines: The ‘Mass Line’ Is A Two-Way Street

by @ Monday, June 15th, 2009. Filed under Marxism, Organizing, Socialism

Serving Popular

Movements, Not

Displacing Them

 

By Marta Harnecker

translated by Federico Fuentes

for Links International Journal of Socialist Renewal

[This is the third in a series of regular articles. Click HERE for other articles in the series. Please return to Links regularly read the next articles in the series.]

1. We have previously stated that politics is the art of constructing a social and political force capable of changing the balance of forces in order to make possible tomorrow that which today appears to be impossible. But, to be able to construct a social force it is necessary for political organizations to demonstrate a great respect for grassroots movements; to contribute to their autonomous development, leaving behind all attempts at manipulation. They must take as their starting point that they aren’t the only ones with ideas and proposals and, on the contrary, grassroots movements have much to offer us, because through their daily struggles they have also learned things, discovered new paths, found solutions and invented methods which can be of great value.

(more...)

email2friend

Guidelines: Building the Left & the Progressive Majority as Counter-Hegemonic Blocs

by @ Thursday, June 11th, 2009. Filed under Marxism, Organizing, Socialism

Winning Hegemony

is Convincing,

Not imposing

By Marta Harnecker

Translated by Federico Fuentes

for Links International Journal of Socialist Renewal

[This is the second in a series of regular articles. Click HERE for other aticles in the series. Please return to Links regularly read the next articles in the series.]

1. Popular movements and, more generally, the different social protagonists who today are engaged in the struggle against neoliberal globalization both at the international and national levels reject, with good reason, attitudes that aim to impose hegemony or control on movements. They don’t accept the steamroller policy that some political and social organizations tended to use that, taking advantage of their position of strength and monopolizing political positions, attempt to manipulate the movement. They don’t accept the authoritarian imposition of a leadership from above; they don’t accept attempts made to lead movements by simply giving orders, no matter how correct they are.

2. Such attitudes, instead of bringing forces together, have the opposite effect. On the one hand, it creates discontent in the other organizations; they feel manipulated and obligated to accept decisions in which they’ve had no participation; and on the other hand, it reduces the number of potential allies, given that an organization that assumes such positions is incapable of representing the real interests of all sectors of the population and often provokes mistrust and skepticism among them.

3. But to fight against positions that seek to impose hegemony does not mean renouncing the fight to win hegemony, which is nothing else but attempting to win over, to persuade others of the correctness of our criteria and the validity of our proposals.

4. To win hegemony doesn’t require having many people in the beginning, a few is enough. The hegemony reached by Movimiento 26 de Julio (July 26 Movement) led by Fidel Castro in Cuba, seems to us to be a sufficiently convincing example of this.

5. More important than creating a powerful party with a large number of militants is to raise a political project that reflects the population’s most deeply felt aspirations, and thus win their minds and hearts. What is important is that its politics succeeds in procuring the support of the masses and consensus in the majority of society.

6. Some parties boast about the large numbers of militants they have, but, in fact, they only lead their members. They key is not whether the party is large or small; what matters is that the people feel they identify with its proposals.

7. Instead of imposing and manipulating, what is necessary is convincing and uniting all those who feel attracted to the project to be implemented. And you can only unite people if the others are respected, if you are willing to share responsibilities with other forces.

8. Today, important sectors of the left have come to understand that their hegemony will be greater when they succeed in bringing more people behind their proposals, even if they may not do so under their banner. We have to abandon the old-fashioned and mistaken practice of demanding intellectual property rights over organizations that dare to hoist their own banner.

9. If an important number of grassroots leaders are won over to these ideas, then it is assures that these ideas will more effectively reach the different popular movements. It is also important to win over distinguished national personalities to the project, because they are public opinion makers and will be effective instruments for promoting the proposals and winning over new supporters.

10. We believe that a good way to measure hegemony obtained by an organization is to examine the number of natural leaders and personalities that have taken up its ideas and, in general, the number of people who identify with them.

11. The level of hegemony obtained by a political organization cannot be measured by the number of political positions that have been won. What is fundamental is that those who occupy leading positions in diverse movements and organizations take up as their own and implement the proposals elaborated by the organization, despite not belonging to it.

12. A test for any political organization that declares itself not as not wanting to impose hegemony or control is being capable of proposing the best people for different positions, whether they are members of that very party, are independent or are members of other parties. The credibility among the people of a project will depend a great deal on the figures that the left raises.

13. Of course this is easier said than done. Frequently, when an organization is strong, it tends to underestimate the contribution that other organizations may have to offer and tend to impose its ideas. It is easier to do this than to take the risk of rising to the challenge to winning people over. While more political positions are obtained, the more careful we have to be of not falling into the desire to impose hegemony or control.

14. Moreover, the concept of hegemony is a dynamic one, since hegemony is not established once and for all. To maintain it requires a process of permanently re-winning it. Life follows its course, new problems arise, and with them new challenges.

[Posted May 25, 2009.]

Marta Harnecker’s bibliography on the topic:

La izquierda en el umbral del Siglo XXI. Haciendo posible lo imposible, Publicado en: México, Siglo XXI Editores, 1999; España,    Siglo XXI Editores, 1ª ed., 1999, 2ª ed., 2000 y 3ª ed., 2000; Cuba, Editorial de Ciencias Sociales, 2000; Portugal, Campo das Letras Editores, 2000; Brasil, Paz e Terra, 2000; Italia, Sperling and Küpfer Editori, 2001; Canadá (francés), Lantôt Éditeur, 2001; El Salvador, Instituto de Ciencias Políticas y Administrativas Farabundo Martí, 2001.

Hacia el Siglo XXI, La izquierda se renueva, Quito, Ecuador, CEESAL, 1991



email2friend

Serious Questions for Serious Times: Getting Organized

by @ Monday, June 1st, 2009. Filed under Marxism, Organizing, Socialism

Insurrections or Revolutions?
The Role of the Political Instrument

[Editor's Note: If you find some agreement with this, check out our 'Where To Begin' document. Click in the upper left corner.]


By Marta Harnecker

Links International Journal of Socialist Renewal

[First in a Series]

1. The recent popular uprisings at the turn of the 21st century that have rocked numerous countries such as Argentina and Bolivia -- and, more generally, the history of the multiple social explosions that have occurred in Latin America and the rest of the world -- have undoubtedly demonstrated that the initiative of the masses, in and of itself, is not enough to defeat ruling regimes.

2. Impoverished urban and country masses, lacking a well-defined plan, have risen up, seized highways, towns and neighbourhoods, ransacked stores and stormed parliaments, but despite achieving the mobilisation of hundreds of thousands of people, neither the size nor their combativeness have been enough to develop from popular insurrection into revolution. They have overthrown presidents, but they haven’t been able to conquer power and initiate a process of deep social transformations.

(more...)

email2friend

The New Within the Old: Karl Marx and the Solidarity Economy

by @ Monday, May 25th, 2009. Filed under Economic Democracy, Marxism, Socialism

Marx, Marxism and

the Cooperative Movement

By Bruno Jossa
Economics, University of Naples

Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2005

1. Introduction

On several occasions Marx declared himself strongly in favor of cooperative firms, maintaining that their generalized introduction would result in a new production mode. At different times in his life he even seems to have been confident that cooperatives would eventually supplant capitalistic firms altogether. Lenin also endorsed the cooperative movement and in a 1923 work (entirely devoted to this subject) he went so far as to equate cooperation with socialism at large. More precisely, besides describing cooperation as an important organizational step in the transition to socialism, he explicitly argued that "cooperation is socialism" (Lenin, 1923). All the same, ever since the time of the Paris Commune the cooperative movement has received little attention from Marxists.

(more...)

email2friend

Lights. Camera. Action. Das Kapital. Now

by @ Tuesday, April 21st, 2009. Filed under Economic Democracy, Economy, Marxism

Thoroughly

Modern Marx

By Leo Panitch

May/June 2009

The economic crisis has spawned a resurgence of interest in Karl Marx. Worldwide sales of Das Kapital have shot up (one lone German publisher sold thousands of copies in 2008, compared with 100 the year before), a measure of a crisis so broad in scope and devastation that it has global capitalism—and its high priests—in an ideological tailspin.

Yet even as faith in neoliberal orthodoxies has imploded, why resurrect Marx? To start, Marx was far ahead of his time in predicting the successful capitalist globalization of recent decades. He accurately foresaw many of the fateful factors that would give rise to today’s global economic crisis: what he called the “contradictions” inherent in a world comprised of competitive markets, commodity production, and financial speculation.

(more...)

email2friend

Finance Capital’s ‘Whole Series of Ponzi Schemes’

by @ Tuesday, April 14th, 2009. Filed under Economic Democracy, Financial Crisis, Marxism, Socialism

 

 David Harvey

Explores the

Logic of Capital

 

A Socialist Review Interview by Joseph Choonara, April 2009

Joseph Choonara spoke to acclaimed Marxist theoretician David Harvey about capitalism's current crisis and his online reading group of Karl Marx's Capital which shows the revival of interest in this work.

Some commentators view the current crisis as arising from problems in finance that then impinged on the wider economy; others see it as a result of issues that arose in production and then led to financial problems. How do you view it?

It's a false dichotomy that's being posed. There is a more dialectical relationship between what you might call the "real" and "financial" sides of the economy. There is no question that there has been an underlying problem of what I would call "over-accumulation" for a considerable time now. And in part the movement into investing in asset values rather than production is a consequence of that. But as the search for new forms of asset value developed you also saw financial innovation that created the possibility of investment in hedge funds and those sorts of things. (more...)

email2friend

[SolidarityEconomy.net is proudly powered by WordPress.]