Archive for the 'Organizing' Category

Prosperity in Italy Spurred by One Region’s Coops

by @ Monday, March 8th, 2010. Filed under Economic Democracy, Organizing, Socialism

Poster: Italy's Federation of Consumer Coops

The Emilia-Romagna Coops:

A Market Without Capitalists

 

By Frances Moore Lappe
Alternet.com
A market economy and capitalism are synonymous --- or at least joined at the hip. That's what most Americans grow up assuming. But it is not necessarily so. Capitalism -- control by those supplying the capital in order to return wealth to shareholders -- is only one way to drive a market.


Granted, it is hard to imagine another possibility for how an economy could work in the abstract. It helps to have a real-life example.


And now I do.

In May I spent five days in Emilia Romagna, a region of four million people in northern central Italy. There, over the last 150 years, a network of consumer, farmer and worker-driven cooperatives has come to generate 30 percent to 40 percent of the region's GDP. Two of every three people in Emilia Romagna are members of co-ops.


The region, whose hub city is Bologna, is home to 8,000 co-ops, producing everything from ceramics to fashion to specialty cheese. Their industriousness is woven into networks based on what cooperative leaders like to call "reciprocity." All co-ops return 3 percent of profits to a national fund for cooperative development, and the movement supports centers providing help in finance, marketing, research and technical expertise.
The presumption is that by aiding each other, all gain. And they have. Per person income is 50 percent higher in Emilia Romagna than the national average.

(more...)

email2friend

Gramsci and the Need to Learn Strategy in Depth

by @ Wednesday, January 20th, 2010. Filed under Organizing, Socialism

The Relevance of

Gramsci’s Theory

for Today

By Peter Latham

January 3, 2010 -- I first read Gramsci in English over 40 years ago. Moreover, my thesis on Theories of the Labour Movement—a Marxist critique of non-Marxist theories of industrial relations—used Gramsci’s concept of the “organic” working class intellectual to explain twentieth century rank and file movements in the British building industry.[1] This paper is based on the Gramsci section in my forthcoming book on The State and Local Government.[2]

Roger Simon—the co-author with Noreen Branson of The British State published in 1958 at the height of the Cold War when they used the pseudonyms James Harvey and Katherine Hood[3]—subsequently revised his approach to take into account what he saw as Gramsci’s modification of classical Marxism, including Leninism. The latter, according to Simon, saw power as concentrated in the state and under the exclusive control of the capitalist class (or part of it) and took the view that the construction of socialism could only begin after the working class took power—as did Harvey and Hood.[4] Conversely, for Simon, Gramsci’s concept of the integral state—“political society plus civil society, in other words, hegemony protected by the armour of coercion”[5]—implied that the working class could only achieve state power after it had won a substantial measure of hegemony in civil society.[6] Simon still rejected the social-democratic theory of state neutrality: but he also rejected Gramsci’s view that factory councils should replace parliamentary democracy.[7] Hence, as well as the democratisation of parliament, Simon advocated direct democracy in the local community and workplace plus broad alliances based on the left and other social movements.[8]

(more...)

email2friend

Jobs Campaigns, New Deal History, National Service and Socialist Values

by @ Tuesday, December 29th, 2009. Filed under Economic Democracy, Economy, Labor Movement, Organizing, Socialism

A Left Role, Renewed Identity,

and How-To, in Campaigns for

National Service Jobs Programs

 

By John Case

Socialist-Economics Group

 

Does the current crisis justify an expanded role for government as an employer of last result?

Consider the following facts from EPI research:

Number unemployed: 15.4 million (up from 7.5 million in December 2007) Portion of official unemployed considered structural: 3.9 million Portion of unemployed who have been jobless more than six months: 38.3% Total jobs lost during the recession: 8.0 million Jobs needed to return to pre-recession unemployment rate: 10.9 million Number of job-seekers per job opening: 6.1 Unemployment rate: 10.0% Underemployment rate: 17.2%; Share of workers un- or underemployed: more than 1 in 6 States with double-digit unemployment in October, 2009: 15 White unemployment: 9.3%; African-American unemployment: 15.6%; Hispanic unemployment:12.7% Manufacturing jobs lost since the start of the recession: 2.1 million (15.5% of sector's jobs) Construction jobs lost in the recession: 1.6 million (20.8%, nearly one in five construction jobs) Mass layoffs (50 or more people by a single employer) in October 2009: 2,127; jobs lost:217,182 Under- and unemployed, marginally attached and involuntary part-time workers: 26.9 million

Americans with no health insurance in 2008: 46.3 million Annual Social Security benefit for average retiree: $13,922; Share of older Americans receiving all their income from Social Security: more than 1 out of 4 Number of children in poverty in 2008: 14.1 million (over one-third) Drop in real median income from 2007 to 2008: 3.6% (largest one-year drop since 1967) Growth rate of nominal, hourly wages of production workers over the last three months:1.7% Additional people covered by Medicaid/SCHIP in 2008: 3 million

Not since the Great Depression has structural unemployment been so intense or sustained. Despite faster and smarter liquidity and fiscal efforts by government than occurred then, employment decline has merely decelerated 24 months into what is now dubbed 'The Great Recession'. It is not yet near enough to avert 5-10 years of unemployment rates above 6% (the level at which the 'Great Recession' started). The foundation of New Deal anti-depression actions, and one of the most successful and long lasting in its effects, was directly putting men to work in public works projects that became associated with several national service programs. The economist Hyman Minsky coined the term 'Employer of Last Resort' to describe government full employment efforts, which were part of his economic prescription, discussed more below, for countering capitalism's inherent vulnerability to financial instability.

This article explores the appropriateness, precedents and how-to's of national service programs (the chief US version of employer of last resort). in responding to the current crisis. The moral and social virtues of putting the unemployed to work in the creation of useful and meaningful public goods, instead of subjecting them to sustained idleness, should be self-evident.

(more...)

email2friend

Food for Thought Dept: Tennessee’s New Wave of High-Road Green Jobs

by @ Monday, December 7th, 2009. Filed under Economy, High Road Economics, Organizing

 

Green Tide: State

taking big steps toward

energy-efficient future

 

By Ed Marcum

Sunday, December 6, 2009

A modest zero-energy project has multiplied into a major career change for one-time software developer David Bolt.

The Roane County resident may be on the cutting edge of an industry wave that could mean valuable jobs for an East Tennessee economy hungry for new investment.

Bolt grew interested in sustainability - also known as energy and environmental conservation - as he was renovating his family's 2,400-square-foot home in Harriman. Through various energy savings features, he modified the house to become a "zero energy" home - one that creates as much energy as it consumes.

Then in 2005, Bolt founded Sustainable Future, an online company that does turnkey design and installation of solar energy systems to homes and businesses.

Bolt may be the tip of a trend that area economic developers pray will lead to widespread employment opportunities in the near future.

By many estimates, a wave of green jobs is about to wash over Tennessee. But some observers question whether the swift current will lift all boats.

(more...)

email2friend

Mondragon Staking Out a Foothold in the U.S.

by @ Thursday, December 3rd, 2009. Filed under Economic Democracy, Organizing

Photo: Evergreen's Industrial Laundry Coop in Cleveland 

This Import

Might Preserve

American Jobs

By: Judith D. Schwartz

Miller-McCune Report

As the U.S. unemployment breaches the 10 percent mark — with manufacturing sector rates even higher — policymakers and industry representatives in the Midwest are seeking strategies to keep the Rust Belt from getting even rustier. In this war for economic survival, groups in cities like Cleveland, Detroit and Chicago, as well as the million-plus-members-strong United Steelworkers Union, have turned to a model borne of another war-torn region: the Mondragón Corporation in the Basque area of Spain.

The Mondragón Corporation (MCC) is a multilayered organization with worker-owned cooperatives and participatory governance at its core. The corporation is a group of cooperatives and cooperative members, a seat of governance as well as planning, researching and generating funding for new businesses — a kind of meta-cooperative.

(more...)

email2friend

Steelworkers Aim at Job Creation with Worker-Owned Factories

by @ Tuesday, November 3rd, 2009. Filed under Economic Democracy, Organizing, Socialism, Trade Unions

Photo: High-tech Machine Tools from MCC

‘One Worker, One Vote:'

US Steelworkers to Experiment

with Factory Ownership,

Mondragon Style


By Carl Davidson
SolidarityEconomy.net


Oct. 27, 2009--The United Steel Workers Union, North America's largest industrial trade union, announced a new collaboration with the world's largest worker-owned cooperative, Mondragon International, based in the Basque region of Spain.


News of the announcement spread rapidly throughout the communities of global justice activists, trade union militants, economic democracy and socialist organizers, green entrepreneurs and cooperative practitioners of all sorts. More than a few raised an eyebrow, but the overwhelming response was, "Terrific! How can we help?"
The vision behind the agreement is job creation, but with a new twist. Since government efforts were being stifled by the greed of financial speculators and private capital was more interested in cheap labor abroad, unions will take matters into their own hands, find willing partners, and create jobs themselves, but in sustainable businesses owned by the workers.

(more...)

email2friend

Naomi Klein Under Fire Over Worker Coops

by @ Thursday, September 3rd, 2009. Filed under Economic Democracy, Labor Movement, Organizing

 

 Fire the Boss!

Hostile Business Reaction as

Workers' Co-ops Gain Visibility

 

By Hazel Corcoran

Executive Director

Canadian Worker Co-op Federation

 

Aug 31, 2009 - Naomi Klein and Avi Lewis, Canadians who made the film 'The Take' in 2004 about worker takeovers in Argentina, are at it again.

In their recent blog posting called "The Cure for Layoffs: Fire the Boss!", they passionately made the case for hostile worker takeovers as a response to the economic crisis. Although they mention worker co-operatives generally, their focus is on mainly on protests, "bossnappings", sit-ins and the like.

CanWest newspapers printed the attack on Klein and Lewis' article without ever having printed the article itself.

Evidently, they touched a nerve. Philosophy professor Joseph Heath wrote an opinion piece in response which appeared in at least four Canadian daily newspapers: "Economics for lefties: Co-ops sound great if you hate big corporations. Not so great if you care about how they work in real life".

Oddly enough, CanWest newspapers printed Heath's response without ever having printed the original Klein and Lewis article. Heath states that, "Klein and Lewis, I must admit, make me a bit crazy. … They blame problems on totally fictitious causes, then recommend solutions that are guaranteed not to work. Like co-ops. … Co-ops are not a 'cure for layoffs.' They cause unemployment."

Co-op supporters should laugh at his ire, not cry. As Gandhi said: "First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." If we believe this, then we are three-quarters of the way there!

Of course in the co-operative way, if "we" win, everybody wins. The point would be to get away from having winners and losers. Co-ops are about creating an economy in which people matter more than profit; in which we create an environment in which people are free to discover the gifts that they bring to this world and have a way to develop them and contribute them to the common good.

Canadian co-operators responded vociferously to Heath's opinion piece through various letters to the editor, refuting every point. You can see some of these letters printed as comments at the bottom of the Ottawa Citizen site.

In fact, Heath's argument is refuted by the full scope of the worker co-op movement which has arisen around the world. In Europe, for example, there are approximately 50,000 worker co-ops with more than 1.4 million worker-owners. Many are manufacturing businesses. In the region in and around Mondragon, Spain, where the economy is based on worker co-operatives, there is lower unemployment than in other regions of Spain.

CICOPA (the International Organisation of Industrial, Artisanal and Service Producers' Co-operatives, which promotes worker co-operatives) notes that "in France alone, in 2007, there were 70 cases of business transfers to employees." The European Parliament has recently passed a resolution in favour of the social economy, which supports business transfer to co-operatives, 580 votes to 27 with 44 abstentions. The success of worker co-operatives, especially in Europe demonstrates the great potential there is for North American workers.

In Canada, legendary labour leader Lynn Williams spoke at the founding meeting of the Western Labour-Worker Co-op Council in September 2006, which has become an active and thriving organization, as reported in the first issue of Work Together. Similar efforts are underway in the US, with a conference on labour solidarity and worker co-ops held in early August, 2009.

"People are absolutely starving for alternatives to our broken system," as Avi Lewis said in his speech at the Canadian Co-operative Association Congress several years ago. He went on, "But they aren't getting them – they don't know about them — and that's where Co-operators will either seize the moment, or watch history pass us by. … It is, after all, when the market fails that co-operatives have historically come to the rescue of communities, economic sectors, even whole ways of life...

"[T]his is both a major challenge and a huge opportunity for you as co-operators right here in Canada. These sites of creative resistance, of urgent struggle and deep co-operation are often not even on the radar…. They need to be."

Even staunch free-marketers like Joseph Heath have to admit that the current economic system is broken. (Well, he doesn't, in this article, but most observers do.) Gandhi also said that wealth without work and commerce without morality are two of the seven worldly sins. Perhaps that's why the free-market capitalist economy broke down.

We need to not only fix it but to replace it with another, co-operative economy whose basic goal is to meet human needs. The stories about co-operatives in Europe and Argentina and around the world demonstrate the worker co-operative movement (even the whole co-operative movement) can be an effective response to the global economic crisis.

But the co-op story needs to reach the public, through voices such as those of Naomi Klein and Avi Lewis, who speak and write with passion and eloquence. We need more public champions, particularly at a time when the corporate-controlled media are spreading misleading, negative information about the worker co-op and broader co-op movements.

If Gandhi was right, then defensive (not to say defamatory) articles in business media are a promising sign. In Avi Lewis' words, at least we are "on the radar". Let us seize the opportunity to use all the networks and smaller media available to us, to highlight the practical steps being taken by activists working in the field. Then, indeed, we may be more than three-quarters of the way to overcoming our broken and exploitive economic system.



email2friend

People’s Plebiscites as a Method of Struggle

by @ Tuesday, August 25th, 2009. Filed under Marxism, Organizing, Socialism

  Popular Consultations: Space for

the Convergence of Different Forces

The Case of Uruguay's  Frente Amplio.

By Marta Harnecker

Translated by Federico Fuentes

for Links: International Journal of Socialist Renewal

[This is the eleventh in a series of regular articles.]

1. I have previously argued the case for the need to create a large social bloc against neoliberalism that can unite all those affected by the system. To achieve this, it is fundamental that we create spaces that allow for the convergence of specific anti-neoliberal struggles where, safeguarding the specific characteristics of each political or social actor, common tasks can be taken up that aid in strengthening the struggle.

2. In this respect, I think that popular consultations or plebiscites are very interesting spaces. These can allow us to mobilize behind a single concrete task of convincing -- undertaking door-to-door popular education -- a large number of people and youth who are beginning to awaken to politics, who want to contribute to a better world, who very often don’t know how to do it, and who are not willing to be active in the traditional way, because many of them reject politics and politicians.

(more...)

email2friend

Solidarity Economy Comes to Cleveland

by @ Wednesday, August 12th, 2009. Filed under Economic Democracy, High Road Economics, Organizing

Photo: Solar Panels on Cleveland Roofs

 Cleveland, Ohio’s

Worker-Owned Boom:

A Path from Rust-Belt

to Recovery


By Gar Alperovitz, Ted Howard, Steve Dubb
Yes! Magazine

This June, the doors opened at the Evergreen Cooperative Laundry, a state-of-the-art, nearly $6 million facility in Cleveland, Ohio.

What’s so special about this laundry? In a word, ownership. The business will be 100 percent owned by its 50 employees, virtually all of whom live in the surrounding community. Life is tough in this neighborhood, where the poverty rate exceeded 30 percent and thousands of homes lay stripped and abandoned even before the current recession began.

In the midst of this urban distress, the Evergreen Laundry employee-owners will earn a living wage and health benefits. As members of the co-op, they will enjoy greater job security than workers at more traditional businesses, and, after seven years on the job, they will have built an ownership stake of as much as $65,000.

(more...)

email2friend

Lessons from Struggle - Contend in All Spheres with the Logic of Solidarity

by @ Wednesday, August 5th, 2009. Filed under Marxism, Organizing, Socialism

 

 A Strategy for

Building Unity

 

 

By Marta Harnecker

translated by Federico Fuentes

for Links International Journal of Socialist Renewal

[This is the tenth in a series of regular articles. ]

 

1. I have previously referred to the necessity of building unity among all left forces and actors in order to be able to group a broad anti-neoliberal bloc around them. Nevertheless, I do not think that this objective can be achieved in a voluntarist manner, creating coordinating bodies from above that end up as simple sums of acronyms.

2. I believe that this unity can emerge through concrete struggles for common objectives. And that is why I think that we can help create better conditions for this unity if we put into practice a new strategy of anti-capitalist struggle.

3. We are talking about a strategy that takes into consideration the important social, political, economic and cultural transformations that have occurred across the world in the last period. One that understands that the new forms of capitalist domination go far beyond the economic and state sphere and have infiltrated into all the interstices of society, fundamentally through the mass media which has indiscriminately invaded the homes of all social sectors, and in doing so changed the conditions of struggle.

(more...)

email2friend

Building Organizations with Unity Resting on Diversity

by @ Sunday, July 19th, 2009. Filed under Marxism, Organizing, Socialism

 

 Respect Differences

and Be Flexible in

Regards to Activism

 

 

By Marta Harnecker

Translated by Federico Fuentes

for Links International Journal of Socialist Renewal

 

[This is the ninth in a series of regular articles.]

1. Among the left, there continues to be a difficulty to work together while respecting differences. In the past, the tendency of political organizations, especially parties that self-declare themselves as parties of the working class, was always towards homogenizing the social base within which they carried out political work. If this attitude was once justified due to the past identity and homogeneity of the working class, today it is anachronistic when confronted with a working class that is quite differentiated, and with the emergence of a diversity of new social actors. Today, we increasingly have to deal with a unity based on diversity, on respect for ethnic and cultural differences, for gender and for the sense of belonging of specific collectives.

2. It is necessary to try channelling commitments to activism by starting with the actual potential of each sector, and even of each person, that is willing to commit itself to the struggle, without seeking to homogenize these actors. It is important to have a special sensibility towards finding all those points of agreement that can allow for the emergence of a common platform of struggle.

(more...)

email2friend

Women’s Coop Occupies Factory, Starts Production

by @ Saturday, July 18th, 2009. Filed under Economic Democracy, High Road Economics, Organizing, Women


Stitching a Future Together:

Women and the Solidarity

Economy in Uruguay

 

By Luis Alberto Carro

Inter-Press Service

ROSARIO, Uruguay, July 5 2009 (IPS) - The group of women cross this Uruguayan town every morning, some on bike and some on foot, on their way to CODEMUR, a women’s cooperative that resurrected a garment factory abandoned by its owners. The women, all between the ages of 40 and 60, are former employees of the once vibrant textile firm Sirfil y Drymar. After the companies closed the local plant without paying the employees the back wages and holiday and severance pay they were owed, some of the women created CODEMUR (Rosario Women’s Cooperative).

After the factory workers were laid off in 2007, the owners began to cart off the merchandise, fabrics and other materials. So the women decided to occupy the plant, and informed the Labour Ministry that they would attempt to get it running again, following in the footsteps of other worker-run factories.

(more...)

email2friend

Lessons from Struggle: Setting the Direction for Change

by @ Saturday, July 11th, 2009. Filed under Marxism, Organizing, Socialism

 

  The Left Must

Try to Set the

Agenda for Struggle

 

By Marta Harnecker

Translated by Federico Fuentes

for Links International Journal of Socialist Renewal

[This is the eighth in a series of regular articles.]

1. In the previous article, we stated that a large section of the party left has found it very difficult to work with social movements and develop ties with the new social forces in recent decades. This has been due to several factors.

2. While the right wing has demonstrated great political initiative, the left tends to be on the defensive. While the former uses its control of the institutions of the state and the mass media, as well as its economic influence, to impose its new model, subservient to financial capital and monopolies, that has precipitated privatizations, labor deregulation and all the other aspects of the neoliberal economic program, to increase social fragmentation and foment anti-partyism, the party left, on the other hand, has almost exclusively limited its political work to the use of current institutionality, subordinating itself to the rules of the game imposed by the enemy, and hardly ever taking them by surprise. The level of absurdity is such that the calendar of struggle of the left is set by the right.

(more...)

email2friend

Surviving Crises: Cooperative Enterprises Weather the Market Economy

by @ Monday, July 6th, 2009. Filed under Economic Democracy, Organizing, Socialism

Photo: Spain’s Eroski grocery stores are Mondragón’s largest cooperative.

Spain’s Eroski grocery stores are Mondragón’s largest cooperative. Photo courtesy www.eroski.esMondragón Coops:

Worker-Operatives

Decide How to

Ride Out a Downturn

By Georgia Kelly and Shaula Massena

The Mondragón Cooperative Corporation (MCC), the largest consortium of worker-owned companies, has developed a different way of doing business—a way that puts workers, not shareholders, first.

Here’s how it played out when one of the Mondragón cooperatives fell on hard times. The worker/owners and the managers met to review their options. After three days of meetings, the worker/owners agreed that 20 percent of the workforce would leave their jobs for a year, during which they would continue to receive 80 percent of their pay and, if they wished, free training for other work. This group would be chosen by lottery, and if the company was still in trouble a year later, the first group would return to work and a second would take a year off.

The result? The solution worked and the company thrives to this day.

(more...)

email2friend

Ideas for Struggle: Authenticity as a Requirement for Mobilization

by @ Wednesday, July 1st, 2009. Filed under Marxism, Organizing, Politics & Elections, Socialism

 

  Reasons for Popular Skepticism

on Politics and Politicians

By Marta Harnecker

translated by Federico Fuentes

for Links International Journal of Socialist Renewal

[This is the seventh in a series of regular articles.]

1. In one of my previous articles, I stated that in order to wage an effective struggle against neoliberalism, it is necessary to unite all those suffering its consequences, and to achieve this objective we must start with the left itself, which in our countries tends to be very dispersed. But, there are many obstacles that impede this task. The first step to overcoming them is to be aware of them and be prepared to face them.

2. One of these obstacles is the growing popular skepticism regarding politics and politicians.

3. This has to do, among other things, with the great constraints that exist today in our democratic systems, which are very different to those that existed prior to the military dictatorships.

(more...)

email2friend

[SolidarityEconomy.net is proudly powered by WordPress.]